Click here to download this article.
- Geopolitical uncertainty was much of the focus last week, with weakness into and through the long three-day weekend in the United States (bitcoin -9.5%, ether -9.6% on the week)
- While gold has outshined bitcoin recently, a broken clock is right twice a day. The asset failed to outperform through the greatest inflationary period in forty years
- Hash rate hits new highs, illustrating increasing network security and the importance of decentralization
Last week’s focus was heavily on Russia and Ukraine tension, with geopolitical risk weighing on risk assets across the board. While broader consensus was for an unlikely invasion during the Winter Olympics, President Biden said on Thursday that an invasion was highly likely. This sent risk assets lower, bitcoin and ether included.
To us, it’s no surprise that selling continued into Friday as traders reduced risk ahead of a long weekend in the United States. And as we’ve just learned on Monday, these forecasts were indeed true: Russia has recognized Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, and troops have entered the regions.
This weakness seen over the weekend reminds investors that for now, bitcoin remains a risk asset through geopolitical uncertainty. The apolitical, uncensored, and decentralized asset is still “emerging” and a result, remains in price-discovery mode.
But as we often put current thematics in long-term perspectives, this volatility due to geopolitical concerns offers another opportunity for investors to buy the dip.
We remind our readers of Russia’s invasion of Crimea in early 2014: the drawdown in the S&P 500 Index was relatively short lived, with a max drawdown of 5.8% and just a 17-day recovery period.
Now, geopolitical risk adds to the (diminishing) monetary uncertainty.
But for one, peak hysteria stemming from monetary policy is likely behind us as investors are now aware a multitude of possibilities. Markets have seven hikes this year priced in, and even 50bps in March and 100bps by July in the back of their minds.
We saw last week that Canada, a nation that prides itself on its democracy, is now taking part in financial censorship when desired. This event further highlights crypto’s ability to avoid censorship as transactions can occur without the need for a central intermediary.
While the current environment for now is an overhang to markets, an attractive opportunity is presented as the underlying fundamentals remain incredibly strong:
- pullbacks have occurred but remain relatively tame
- members of congress and states across the US are becoming increasingly pro bitcoin
- regulatory bodies have been reasonable
- hash rate has hit all time highs and renewable mining is now a thematic
- bitcoin is now considered a “macro asset”
Gold Outshines Recently, But Bitcoin Likely to Have Last Laugh
While gold completely failed to outperform in anticipation of and eventually throughout the greatest inflationary period in forty years (spot gold down 3.6% in 2021), gold has found some light and is now up 3.9% year-to-date. While gold can have its day, we believe digitalization, technology, and changing investor preferences (among many others) will ultimately result in bitcoin having the last laugh. Gold’s performance relative to bitcoin since inception:
Tantrum Assets Rally in Tandem
We update our “Tantrum Table” that monitors a variety of risk assets impacted by uncertainty around the Federal Reserve’s process of normalization. While many of these lows are in sync around January’s FOMC meeting (see our last report here), markets have pulled back from bounce highs, and some assets have created new lows.
We update this table to highlight the resilience of bitcoin and ether, both of which remain 4.8% and 9.4% above their recent lows. As of Monday, February 21st:
Hash Rate Hits New Highs
Hash rate, or the aggregate computational power of bitcoin miners, hit all-time highs last week.
As one may remember, China banned mining in the mainland in mid-2021 which led to hash rate dropping over 50%.
As we often explain, this led to the great migration of bitcoin miners westward; the United States now holds over 35% of global hash power.
This hash rate has again hit new all-time highs, a sign that more miners are securing the network by verifying bitcoin’s transactions.
Click here for the full PDF. As always, please reach out with any questions or comments.
Joseph Orsini, CFA
Director of Research
Price Volatility of Digital Assets – A principal risk in trading Digital Assets is the rapid fluctuation of market price. High price volatility undermines Digital Assets’ role as a medium of exchange as consumers or retailers are much less likely to accept them as a form of payment. The value of client portfolios relates in part to the value of the Digital Assets held in the client portfolio and fluctuations in the price of Digital Assets could adversely affect the value of a client’s portfolio. There is no guarantee that a client will be able to achieve a better than average market price for Digital Assets or will purchase Digital Assets at the most favorable price available. The price of Digital Assets achieved by a client may be affected generally by a wide variety of complex and difficult to predict factors such as Digital Asset supply and demand; rewards and transaction fees for the recording of transactions on the blockchain; availability and access to Digital Asset service providers (such as payment processors), exchanges, miners or other Digital Asset users and market participants; perceived or actual Digital Asset network or Digital Asset security vulnerability; inflation levels; fiscal policy; interest rates; and political, natural and economic events.
Digital Asset Service Providers – Several companies and financial institutions provide services related to the buying, selling, payment processing and storing of virtual currency (i.e., banks, accountants, exchanges, digital wallet providers, and payment processors). However, there is no assurance that the virtual currency market, or the service providers necessary to accommodate it, will continue to support Digital Assets, continue in existence or grow. Further, there is no assurance that the availability of and access to virtual currency service providers will not be negatively affected by government regulation or supply and demand of Digital Assets. Accordingly, companies or financial institutions that currently support virtual currency may not do so in the future.
Custody of Digital Assets – Under the Advisers Act, SEC registered investment advisers are required to hold securities with “qualified custodians,” among other requirements. Certain Digital Assets may be deemed to be securities. Currently, many of the companies providing Digital Assets custodial services fall outside of the SEC’s definition of “qualified custodian”, and many long-standing, prominent qualified custodians do not provide custodial services for Digital Assets or otherwise provide such services only with respect to a limited number of actively traded Digital Assets. Accordingly, clients may use non- qualified custodians to hold all or a portion of their Digital Assets.
Government Oversight of Digital Assets – The regulatory schemes—both foreign and domestic—possibly affecting Digital Assets or a Digital Asset network may not be fully developed and subject to change. It is possible that any jurisdiction may, in the near or distant future, adopt laws, regulations, policies or rules directly or indirectly affecting a Digital Asset network, generally, or restricting the right to acquire, own, hold, sell, convert, trade, or use Digital Assets, or to exchange Digital Assets for either fiat currency or other virtual currency. It is also possible that government authorities may take direct or indirect investigative or prosecutorial action related to, among other things, the use, ownership or transfer of Digital Assets, resulting in a change to its value or to the development of a Digital Asset.